Current:Home > ContactA second high court rules that Japan’s ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional -ProfitPoint
A second high court rules that Japan’s ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional
View
Date:2025-04-17 11:53:53
TOKYO (AP) — A second Japanese high court ruled Wednesday that the government’s policy against same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, the latest in a series of decisions upholding plaintiffs’ demands for marriage equality.
The Tokyo High Court called the ongoing ban “a groundless legal discrimination based on sexual orientation,” saying it violates the constitutional guarantee of right to equality, as well as individuals’ dignity and equality between sexes. It was a clearer statement than the 2022 lower court decision that described the situation as “an unconstitutional state.”
The Sapporo High Court ruling in March said not allowing same-sex couples to marry and enjoy the same benefits as straight couples violates their fundamental right to equality and freedom of marriage. Wednesday’s ruling is the seventh overall that found the ongoing ban to be unconstitutional or nearly so, against only one district court decision that found it constitutional. The rulings can still be appealed to the Supreme Court.
In Wednesday’s ruling, Presiding Judge Sonoe Taniguchi also wrote that the purpose of marriage is not only to produce offspring but also to ensure stable legal status for the partners, and that there is no rational reason to justify excluding same-sex couples. She said there is a shared international consensus against discriminating based on sexual orientation.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said Wednesday’s ruling has not been finalized and that his government will continue to watch other pending court cases.
Still, the winning streak has raised hopes among the LGBTQ+ community.
Plaintiffs cheered outside of the court Wednesday, while their supporters held banners carrying messages such as “Further advance toward marriage equality!” and “No more waiting for legal revision!”
Makiko Terahara, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, welcomed the ruling, calling it historic. She and her fellow lawyers in a statement demanded the government immediately take steps “to open the door for marriage equality.”
“I felt grateful to be alive when I heard the word ‘unconstitutional’ from the judge,” said Yoko Ogawa, a plaintiff in her 60s. She said she worries about a lack of legal protection for her and her partner as they age, and that “I hope to see progress toward legalization as soon as possible.”
Their main obstacle, Japan’s conservative Liberal Democratic Party’s ruling coalition, lost a parliamentary majority in Sunday’s election and is likely to have to compromise on more liberal policies pushed by the opposition parties such as marriage equality, which is largely supported by the general public.
Japan is the only member of the Group of Seven industrialized countries that does not recognize same-sex marriage or provide any other form of legally binding protection for LGBTQ+ couples.
Six lawsuits on marriage equality have been filed at five regions across Japan since 2019. LGBTQ+ activists and their supporters have stepped up their efforts, and in 2023, the government adopted a law that is not legally binding that states discrimination is unacceptable.
Hundreds of municipalities have issued partnership certificates as a workaround for same-sex couples to lower their hurdles in renting apartments and facing other forms of discrimination, but it does not provide the same legal benefit as heterosexual couples, Wednesday’s ruling said.
The court, however, rejected a request by the seven plaintiffs that the government pay them 1 million yen (about $6,500) each in compensation for damages suffered under the current system that does not recognize them as legally married.
On Tuesday, the United Nations women’s rights committee in Geneva published a report that urged the Japanese government to amend civil code to allow an option of allowing married couples to retain separate surnames. It noted that the current law requiring only one surname compels virtually all women to adopt their husband’s surname, another issue also stalled by the LDP for decades.
The U.N. committee also urged Japan to revise the male-only succession rule under the Imperial House Law to allow a female emperor.
Hayashi called the report “regrettable” and “inappropriate.” He said the imperial succession is a matter of national foundation and that it is not part of constitutional basic rights.
___
Associated Press video journalist Ayaka McGill contributed to this report.
veryGood! (34)
Related
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- UFC Hall of Famer Mark Coleman 'battling for his life' after saving parents from house fire
- 'Devastating': Missing Washington woman's body found in Mexican cemetery, police say
- Tennessee headlines 2024 SEC men's basketball tournament schedule, brackets, storylines
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Ryan Gosling and Emily Blunt talk Sunday's 'epic' 'I'm Just Ken' Oscars performance
- 3 women and dog found dead, man fatally shot by police in North Las Vegas: Police
- 2025 COLA estimate increases with inflation, but seniors still feel short changed.
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- U.S. giving Ukraine $300 million in weapons even as Pentagon lacks funds to replenish stockpile
Ranking
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- Warriors star Steph Curry says he's open to a political career after basketball
- New York Times is sending copyright takedown notices to Wordle clones
- Millie Bobby Brown's Stranger Things Season 5 Premiere Update Will Turn Your Smile Upside Down
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- Over 6 million homeowners, many people of color, don't carry home insurance. What can be done?
- Schedule, bracket, storylines and what to know for the Big East men's tournament
- Bears signing Jonathan Owens, Simone Biles' husband, to 2-year deal: 'Chicago here he comes'
Recommendation
Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
Wisconsin Supreme Court will reconsider ruling limiting absentee ballot drop boxes
ACC mascots get blessed at Washington National Cathedral in hilarious video
TEA Business College’s Mission and Achievements
The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
South Dakota gov. promotes work on her teeth by Texas dentist in infomercial-style social media post
Dozens of big U.S. companies paid top executives more than they paid in federal taxes, report says
House poised to pass bill that could ban TikTok but it faces uncertain path in the Senate